🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, states are pouring enormous sums into what's termed “sovereign AI” – building domestic machine learning systems. Starting with Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, countries are competing to build AI that understands native tongues and local customs.

The Global AI Arms Race

This initiative is a component of a broader worldwide contest dominated by large firms from the America and the People's Republic of China. While companies like OpenAI and a social media giant allocate substantial funds, developing countries are also making sovereign bets in the AI field.

Yet given such huge amounts at stake, can smaller nations secure significant gains? According to a analyst from a well-known thinktank, “Unless you’re a wealthy nation or a large corporation, it’s a significant burden to build an LLM from the ground up.”

Defence Considerations

A lot of states are unwilling to use external AI models. In India, for instance, Western-developed AI tools have occasionally proven inadequate. A particular example saw an AI assistant employed to educate learners in a isolated community – it communicated in the English language with a thick Western inflection that was nearly-incomprehensible for local users.

Furthermore there’s the state security factor. In the Indian defence ministry, employing certain international systems is viewed not permissible. According to a entrepreneur explained, It's possible it contains some arbitrary training dataset that could claim that, oh, Ladakh is separate from India … Utilizing that particular AI in a military context is a major risk.”

He further stated, I’ve discussed with people who are in defence. They want to use AI, but, setting aside certain models, they don’t even want to rely on American platforms because data could travel outside the country, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

Homegrown Initiatives

As a result, a number of states are backing domestic ventures. One this project is being developed in India, in which a firm is working to build a sovereign LLM with public funding. This initiative has allocated about $1.25bn to machine learning progress.

The founder foresees a system that is more compact than leading tools from US and Chinese tech companies. He notes that the country will have to make up for the resource shortfall with talent. Located in India, we lack the advantage of allocating massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we vie with for example the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the United States is investing? I think that is the point at which the core expertise and the brain game plays a role.”

Regional Focus

Throughout the city-state, a government initiative is funding AI systems educated in the region's local dialects. These languages – for example the Malay language, Thai, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and additional ones – are often inadequately covered in American and Asian LLMs.

I hope the experts who are developing these sovereign AI systems were informed of how rapidly and just how fast the frontier is progressing.

A leader engaged in the project notes that these tools are created to supplement more extensive AI, instead of substituting them. Tools such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he says, frequently struggle with local dialects and culture – interacting in stilted Khmer, for instance, or suggesting non-vegetarian recipes to Malaysian consumers.

Developing native-tongue LLMs permits state agencies to incorporate local context – and at least be “informed users” of a powerful system developed overseas.

He further explains, “I’m very careful with the term independent. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we aim to be more accurately reflected and we aim to understand the capabilities” of AI technologies.

Multinational Collaboration

For states seeking to find their place in an growing worldwide landscape, there’s a different approach: join forces. Analysts associated with a prominent university put forward a government-backed AI initiative shared among a group of emerging countries.

They term the project “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, in reference to the European effective strategy to develop a competitor to Boeing in the 1960s. The plan would entail the formation of a public AI company that would pool the resources of different countries’ AI projects – such as the UK, Spain, Canada, Germany, Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a strong competitor to the American and Asian giants.

The main proponent of a report outlining the concept notes that the concept has gained the interest of AI leaders of at least three countries to date, in addition to multiple state AI organizations. While it is currently focused on “middle powers”, developing countries – Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda for example – have likewise indicated willingness.

He explains, “Nowadays, I think it’s just a fact there’s reduced confidence in the commitments of this current American government. Individuals are wondering for example, should we trust any of this tech? Suppose they opt to